Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Allergy ; 78(3): 639-662, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233683

ABSTRACT

The current monkeypox disease (MPX) outbreak constitutes a new threat and challenge for our society. With more than 55,000 confirmed cases in 103 countries, World Health Organization declared the ongoing MPX outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on July 23, 2022. The current MPX outbreak is the largest, most widespread, and most serious since the diagnosis of the first case of MPX in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a country where MPX is an endemic disease. Throughout history, there have only been sporadic and self-limiting outbreaks of MPX outside Africa, with a total of 58 cases described from 2003 to 2021. This figure contrasts with the current outbreak of 2022, in which more than 55,000 cases have been confirmed in just 4 months. MPX is, in most cases, self-limiting; however, severe clinical manifestations and complications have been reported. Complications are usually related to the extent of virus exposure and patient health status, generally affecting children, pregnant women, and immunocompromised patients. The expansive nature of the current outbreak leaves many questions that the scientific community should investigate and answer in order to understand this phenomenon better and prevent new threats in the future. In this review, 50 questions regarding monkeypox virus (MPXV) and the current MPX outbreak were answered in order to provide the most updated scientific information and to explore the potential causes and consequences of this new health threat.


Subject(s)
Monkeypox virus , Monkeypox , Child , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Disease Outbreaks , Monkeypox/diagnosis , Monkeypox/epidemiology
2.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 34(1): e13900, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2213793

ABSTRACT

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a rare, but severe complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It develops approximately 4 weeks after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and involves hyperinflammation with multisystem injury, commonly progressing to shock. The exact pathomechanism of MIS-C is not known, but immunological dysregulation leading to cytokine storm plays a central role. In response to the emergence of MIS-C, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) established a task force (TF) within the Immunology Section in May 2021. With the use of an online Delphi process, TF formulated clinical statements regarding immunological background of MIS-C, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and the role of COVID-19 vaccinations. MIS-C case definition is broad, and diagnosis is made based on clinical presentation. The immunological mechanism leading to MIS-C is unclear and depends on activating multiple pathways leading to hyperinflammation. Current management of MIS-C relies on supportive care in combination with immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory agents. The most frequently used agents are systemic steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. Despite good overall short-term outcome, MIS-C patients should be followed-up at regular intervals after discharge, focusing on cardiac disease, organ damage, and inflammatory activity. COVID-19 vaccination is a safe and effective measure to prevent MIS-C. In anticipation of further research, we propose a convenient and clinically practical algorithm for managing MIS-C developed by the Immunology Section of the EAACI.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/diagnosis , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/therapy
3.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 58(4): 1229-1236, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2209191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The imposition of lockdowns during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 pandemic led to a significant decrease in pediatric care utilization in 2020. After restrictions were loosened, a surge in pediatric respiratory disease was observed in pediatric wards. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of the lockdown(s) on the incidence of pediatric respiratory disease. METHODS: For this multicenter retrospective study, emergency department (ED) visit and admission data between January 2017 and September 2021 was collected from eight general hospitals in the Netherlands. Clinical diagnoses were extracted and categorized in groups ("communicable infectious disease," "all respiratory infections," "upper respiratory tract infection," "lower respiratory tract infection," and "asthma/preschool wheezing"). The incidence of admissions and ED visits during 2020 and 2021 was compared to the incidence in 2017-2019. RESULTS: Successive lockdowns resulted in a maximum decrease of 61% and 57% in ED visits and admissions, respectively. After loosening restrictions during the summer of 2021, a 48% overall increase in ED visits and 31% overall increase in admission numbers was observed in July compared to the average July in 2017-2019. This was explained by a 381% increase in ED visits and a 528% increase in ward admissions due to overall respiratory infections, mainly due to lower respiratory tract infections. CONCLUSIONS: Successive lockdowns in the spring and winter of 2020 and 2021 led to a decreased incidence of communicable infections, especially respiratory tract infections. The resulting lack of pediatric immunity resulted in an off-season surge in care utilization at an unexpected moment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Seasons , Communicable Disease Control , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Emergency Service, Hospital
4.
Eur J Pediatr ; 182(3): 1137-1142, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2174147

ABSTRACT

During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries imposed (partial) lockdowns that reduced viral transmission. However, these interventions may have unfavorable effects on emotional and psychological well-being. The aim of this study was to quantify possible adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological wellbeing in children and adolescents. Hospital admission data between January 2017 and September 2021 from eight general hospitals in the Netherlands was collected, comparing the incidences of sub-categorized psychological diagnoses, more specifically eating disorders, intentional intoxications, accidental intoxications, and excessive crying, before (2017-2019) and during the pandemic (2020-2021). Data was summarized per month and per year, and the years 2020 and 2021 were compared to 2017-2019. The relative increase or decrease in diagnoses since the start of the pandemic was calculated. Overall pediatric hospital admissions decreased with 28% since the start of the pandemic. Non-infectious diagnoses showed a decrease of 8%. Of these non-infectious diagnoses, overall psychosocial admissions were increased (+ 9%), mostly caused by an increase in admissions for eating disorders (+ 64%) and intoxications in adolescents (+ 24%). In addition, the proportion of admissions due to psychosocial diagnoses increased post-pandemic (6% vs 4%, p < 0.001). Overall admissions for intoxications in children (- 3%) and excessive crying (- 1%) did not increase, although peaks in incidence were found at the start of the second lockdown. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, admission rates for eating disorders and intentional intoxications showed a substantial increase, indicating a high burden of pediatric psychiatric diseases. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on psychosocial wellbeing in children and adolescents. WHAT IS NEW: • There was an increase in admissions due to psychosocial problems in the Netherlands in the period after the pandemic. • This was mainly caused by an increase in crisis admissions due to eating disorders and intoxications in adolescents.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Feeding and Eating Disorders , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Incidence , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology
5.
Chron Respir Dis ; 18: 14799731211029658, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1295375

ABSTRACT

Population studies showed a decrease in psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asthma is associated with a negative effect on anxiety and depression, which might worsen during the COVID-19 lockdown. The aim of the study was to compare fear, anxiety and depression between asthma patients and patients wit hout asthma pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19 pandemic.This study compares fear, anxiety and depression in asthma patients and controls between pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19 lockdown with a cross-sectional online survey. Participants were invited to fill out several questionnaires pertaining to fear, anxiety, depression, asthma control and quality of life.Asthma patients (N = 37) displayed, during the course of the pandemic, a clinically relevant increase in anxiety (3.32 ± 2.95 vs. 6.68 ± 3.78; p < 0.001) and depression (1.30 ± 1.15 vs. 3.65 ± 3.31; p < 0.001), according to the hospital anxiety and depression levels (HADS) compared to pre-COVID-19 assessment. This was not seen in controls. Also, asthma patients displayed more anxiety about acquiring COVID-19 disease compared to controls ((5.11 ± 1.99 vs. 3.50 ± 2.79), p = 0.006).Patients with asthma experienced an increase in anxiety and depression levels and were more afraid of acquiring COVID-19 disease compared to controls. Also, patients with asthma were more likely to avoid healthcare facilities due to fear of acquiring COVID-19 disease compared to controls. Therefore, we advise health care workers to address these possible negative effects on mental health by phone or e-consults.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Asthma , COVID-19 , Depression , Fear/psychology , Quality of Life , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Physical Distancing , Remote Consultation/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
6.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 8(1)2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1218237

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Following the recent COVID-19 lockdown, a reduction in emergency healthcare visits was reported. Infectious diseases were less often diagnosed, while it was not clear if this was due to a decrease in prevalence or a decrease in emergency healthcare visits due to fear of COVID-19. METHODS: This study comprises a follow-up from a recently finished randomised controlled trial, to gain insight into the prevalence of asthma exacerbation and fear of COVID-19 in patients with moderate-severe asthma and controls in the Netherlands. Participants, patients with asthma and controls, were invited to fill out a short survey by email or post. Exacerbation frequencies until 1 July 2020 were verified with the hospitals' and general practitioners' medical records, pharmacies and patient interviews. RESULTS: In quarter 2 of 2020, mean exacerbation frequency per patient was significantly lower (χ2(3)=9.91, p=0.019) compared with quarter 2 in previous years. Patients with asthma were more likely to avoid (38.8%; controls, 0.0%, p<0.01) or delay (24.5%; controls, 0.0%, p=0.02) essential medical visits due to fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection at medical facilities. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found a significantly reduced asthma exacerbation frequency during COVID-19 social distancing measures compared with previous years. Patients with asthma also showed more anxiety towards (acquiring) COVID-19 infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL8576.


Subject(s)
Asthma/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Adult , Anxiety/etiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Eur J Pediatr ; 180(7): 2271-2279, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1135160

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has enormous impact on society and healthcare. Countries imposed lockdowns, which were followed by a reduction in care utilization. The aims of this study were to quantify the effects of lockdown on pediatric care in the Netherlands, to elucidate the cause of the observed reduction in pediatric emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions, and to summarize the literature regarding the effects of lockdown on pediatric care worldwide. ED visits and hospital admission data of 8 general hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2016 and June 2020 were summarized per diagnosis group (communicable infections, noncommunicable infections, (probable) infection-related, and noninfectious). The effects of lockdown were quantified with a linear mixed effects model. A literature review regarding the effect of lockdowns on pediatric clinical care was performed. In total, 126,198 ED visits and 47,648 admissions were registered in the study period. The estimated reduction in general pediatric care was 59% and 56% for ED visits and admissions, respectively. The largest reduction was observed for communicable infections (ED visits: 76%; admissions: 77%), whereas the reduction in noninfectious diagnoses was smaller (ED visits 36%; admissions: 37%). Similar reductions were reported worldwide, with decreases of 30-89% for ED visits and 19-73% for admissions.Conclusion: Pediatric ED utilization and hospitalization during lockdown were decreased in the Netherlands and other countries, which can largely be attributed to a decrease in communicable infectious diseases. Care utilization for other conditions was decreased as well, which may indicate that care avoidance during a pandemic is significant. What is Known: • The COVID-19 pandemic had enormous impact on society. • Countries imposed lockdowns to curb transmission rates, which were followed by a reduction in care utilization worldwide. What is New: • The Dutch lockdown caused a significant decrease in pediatric ED utilization and hospitalization, especially in ED visits and hospital admissions because of infections that were not caused by SARS-CoV-2. • Care utilization for noninfectious diagnoses was decreased as well, which may indicate that pediatric care avoidance during a pandemic is significant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Child , Communicable Disease Control , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Netherlands/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Allergy ; 75(10): 2445-2476, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-614472

ABSTRACT

With the worldwide spread of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) resulting in declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020, the SARS-CoV-2-induced coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has become one of the main challenges of our times. The high infection rate and the severe disease course led to major safety and social restriction measures worldwide. There is an urgent need of unbiased expert knowledge guiding the development of efficient treatment and prevention strategies. This report summarizes current immunological data on mechanisms associated with the SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 development and progression to the most severe forms. We characterize the differences between adequate innate and adaptive immune response in mild disease and the deep immune dysfunction in the severe multiorgan disease. The similarities of the human immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are underlined. We also summarize known and potential SARS-CoV-2 receptors on epithelial barriers, immune cells, endothelium and clinically involved organs such as lung, gut, kidney, cardiovascular, and neuronal system. Finally, we discuss the known and potential mechanisms underlying the involvement of comorbidities, gender, and age in development of COVID-19. Consequently, we highlight the knowledge gaps and urgent research requirements to provide a quick roadmap for ongoing and needed COVID-19 studies.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/immunology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Academies and Institutes , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/pathology , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL